Todd Wilkinson, president-elect of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA), said the group has remain engaged with USDA and industry stakeholders on animal traceability.
FLEXIBILITY, PRIVACY, MINIMIZED COST ALL CRITICAL
"It is critical that any program ultimately adopted by USDA allows for maximum flexibility and privacy. At the same time, USDA must also minimize the costs for producers and any business disruptions to the industry," Wilkinson said.
Citing the risks of foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks globally -- and the depopulated livestock that go along with that disease -- "the need for bold action is immediate and evident," Wilkinson added. Still, Wilkinson indicated animal traceability rules also must be workable and the group is reviewing the proposal.
"Cattle producers can be confident that any finished product will protect our national livestock herd," Wilkinson said. "We will ensure it provides maximum producer privacy and flexibility with minimal costs, exactly what our stakeholders have told us they expect from USDA."
In a statement on the proposal, the U.S. Cattlemen's Association (USCA) cited that about 89% of the U.S. cattle and bison heard "WILL NOT be impacted by the changes in this proposal," but added that the group's members "understand the importance of building an animal traceability system that doesn't burden producers, is effective for disease tracebacks, and maintains the confidentiality of individuals."
USCA's Animal Health and Identification Committee will soon meet to discuss the contents of the proposed rule and formulate a response, the group stated.
NEED TO IMPROVE TRACEABILITY
In its proposal, APHIS highlighted the need to improve the ability to trace animals back from slaughter and forward from the animals' home farm or ranch, as well as tracing additional movements of the livestock.
Tracing the location and movement of animals doesn't prevent animal disease outbreaks, but does allow state, federal and tribal veterinarians to limit potentially disease outbreaks and limit the damage they can cause to the U.S. cattle and bison industries, APHIS stated. "A comprehensive animal disease traceability system is the best protection against a devastating disease outbreak," APHIS stated in the proposed rule.
Highlighting the risks that foot-and-mouth disease would cause, APHIS noted "time is critical" when it comes to tracing animal movements. Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) can transmit from animal to animal in as little as 34 to 48 hours. While not found in the U.S., APHIS stated "even a small outbreak of FMD would have multi-billion-dollar impacts on U.S. livestock producers' access to export markets with additional losses to production, reproduction and animal population."
Other diseases such as bovine tuberculosis move slowly but can infect multiple herds before the disease is detected.
APHIS stated EID ear tags "offer a number of advantages over non-EID ear tags." Simple visual ear tags can be harder to read, and the numbers on the tags could be only recorded on paper, or manually entered into a database. For EID ear tags, they can be read as livestock pass by an electronic reader. Once the ear tag is scanned, then the tag number can be quickly transmitted to a database.
APHIS SAYS QUICKER, LESS ERROR
This reduces the risk of error and makes it significantly quicker for veterinarians to access the information, APHIS noted.
"Disease investigations that involve tracing an animal with electronic records take only minutes to hours, while searching paper records for a visual ear tag number can take days to weeks or longer," APHIS stated. "Shorter disease investigations minimize the impact on individual producers, herds, businesses, and communities."
In moving cattle and bison across state lines, USDA records show about 11 million cattle per year from 2017-21 had only visual identification tags that were not electronic, which equates to about 11% of the national herds for cattle and bison.
A cost-benefit analysis from USDA estimated it would cost about $26.1 million per year to purchase roughly 11 million EID ear tags for those producers who currently do not use EID ear tags on their cattle or bison.
Under the proposal, EID ear tags would be required six months after a final rule is published in the Federal Register.
APHIS is also proposing new rules for record retention and access requirement for record pertaining to slaughter cattle.
The proposed rule will have a 60-day comment period that should run until March 22.
The rule will be published Jan. 19 in the Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/…
Also see, "Ask the Vet, On-Farm Cattle IDs and Traceability," https://www.dtnpf.com/…
Chris Clayton can be reached at Chris.Clayton@dtn.com
Follow him on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN
(c) Copyright 2023 DTN, LLC. All rights reserved.
If you have any questions on Ear Tag Livestock Tracking, Ear Tag Applicator. We will give the professional answers to your questions.